PFAS Traps – #WATWB

#WATWB — Self Assembling PFAS Traps

In a world where the news gets worse every day, where words like quarantining and self-isolating have become part of our everyday jargon, and where environmental degradation seems to be the least of our worries, where the world sits, steeped in misery and despair and at the point of implosion, there’s finally something to raise our spirits an inch:  PFAS traps.

First off, what the heck is PFAS?

Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances — collectively known as PFAS — are a group of man-made chemicals that include PFOA, PFOS, GenX, and many others.  Manufacturing of PFAS began in the 1940s and soon this miracle product was being used in all kinds of products ranging from GorTex to teflon pans.  

And PFAS had superpowers.  They could repel both oil and water at the same time and were so versatile that  manufacturers started putting these chemicals into everything:  waterproof clothing, shoes, non-stick cookware, personal care products like hairspray and foundation, paints, carpet, fast food wrappers, cardboard packaging, electrical wire casings, surfactants, emulsifiers, and hundreds of other products.  Eggs don’t stick when you cook with teflon and clean up is a breeze.  And who wants to climb Mt. Everest wearing 20 pounds of wet wool when you can wick moisture away with GorTex?  Even airports and army bases were using PFAS in their fire fighting foam.

What an amazing product, right?

Unfortunately, our greatest triumphs are often our Achilles heel.

The name PFAS describes the entire suite of chemicals with a fluorine and carbon bond so strong they have been dubbed “forever” chemicals.  Further, the widespread use of PFAS has made them insanely persistent in the environment.  There’s about 5,000 chemicals under this umbrella but the two most studied are PFOA and PFOS.  While PFOS has been phased out of production, there are still plenty of replacements.

PFAS chemicals migrate through air, water, soil, food, even dust.  They’re also used in packaging.  Likely exposure routes are through food or water contaminated with PFAS, and through our skin via personal care products and clothing.   For instance, if you scratch your teflon pan, the chemicals in the coating are released, so you get to have PFAS with your eggs.

The FDA found PFAS contamination in many foods sampled at the grocery store including seafood, and even chocolate cake.  Currently there are no MCLs — maximum contaminant levels — for PFAS in drinking water, just a health advisory level of 70 ppt — that’s about 3 drops in an entire swimming pool.  It’s not an enforceable regulation but it is driven by a risk assessment.

Health effects of PFAS include cancer, liver damage, developmental issues and more.  A report by the CDC found PFAS in the blood serum of practically everyone in the U.S.   The number was going down since removing certain PFAS from many consumer products — which is good news.  And the industry is replacing the old chemicals with shorter carbon chain chemicals like GenX, but we don’t know a lot about these shorter chain chemicals.  We do know more research is needed to understand the fate and transport and exposure routes and that’s going to take more time, but do we have it?

Regulating PFAS is a complicated issue, but that doesn’t mean that the water utilities haven’t figured some things out.  PFAS are resistant to chemical treatment but they can be removed using granular activated carbon (GAC), reverse osmosis, and ion exchange resins.

And now, hopefully, with PFAS traps.

Scientists at the University of Buffalo have discovered self-assembling PFAS traps.  By creating a tetrahedral cage made from iron and other organics that assemble like Legos, they are able to trap the PFAS to the outside of the chamber.  The hope is to use these traps to pull PFAS out of drinking water which could ultimately improve water quality and drinking water standards.

And who wouldn’t be happy with a little purer water?

It’s the last Friday of the month.  Time to share the good news on We Are the World Blogfest — #WATWB — a monthly good news trip around the world.  May we all be energized and rejuvenated by the good news.  If you’re interested in joining our Blog Hop, the guidelines are as follows:

1. Keep your post to below 500 words;

2. Link to a human news story on the last Friday of each month that demonstrates love, kindness, humanity, support, open-mindedness, you know, that kind of stuff, but no proselytizing, preaching or inconsiderateness toward others;

3. Post on the last Friday of the month in sharing the good news.  No story is too big or small;

4. Place the WE ARE THE WORLD Badge on your sidebar and help spread the word on social media. Tweets, Facebook shares, G+ shares using the #WATWB hashtag through the month most welcome;

5. Read and comment on others’ posts, play nice, and make friends;

6. To sign up, add your link in WE ARE THE WORLD Linky List below.

Click here to enter your link and view this Linky Tools list.  This month’s cohosts are:

Susan Scott – http://www.gardenofedenblog.com/

Inderpreet Kaur Uppal – http://inderpreetuppal.com/

Shilpa Garg – https://shilpaagarg.com/

Peter Nena – https://drkillpatient01.wordpress.com/

Thanks for reading!

pam lazos 7.31.20

About Pam Lazos

writer, blogger, environmentally hopeful
This entry was posted in clean water, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to PFAS Traps – #WATWB

  1. Pingback: Good News! – Stine Writing

  2. Kally says:

    Eek! I just watched the movie Dark Waters on how Dupont kept secrets about Teflon. It is an interesting movie if you haven’t watch it.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Linda Schaub says:

    Pam – I apologize … I tried to cut/paste and the article about toxic algae bloom and it pasted an article I sent to another blogger, an avid gardener, who received the mysterious seeds from China. This guy in the story got the seeds two months ago and planted them before hearing the news stories cautioning against doing so. The authorities have dug up the plant, which they think is invasive. Actually it is an interesting story too. The fellow blogger orders a lot of seeds as she has a huge garden and thought that’s where they got her name. Cutting and pasting an incorrect link has happened before … I don’t think it is user error, but perhaps a weary mouse at day’s end. 🙂 Here is the correct story about the toxic algae bloom: https://wwjnewsradio.radio.com/articles/news/health-officials-warn-of-potentially-toxic-scum-in-mich-lake?utm_campaign=https://wwjnewsradio.radio.com/&utm_content=1596748146&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_term=WWJ-AM&fbclid=IwAR0YQSxlhJZqmoeRXAW71noCtDOK3GoLn5aB7AoO8tSWH_jN4jUoKYgv5tw

    Liked by 1 person

    • Pam Lazos says:

      Ugh! This is even worse than the last one! Where’s it coming from or is the toxicity natural?

      Like

      • Linda Schaub says:

        Some is natural and caused by stagnant water if there is no rain or even a breeze to stir the water and extreme heat. Some is a result of runoff pollution. It gets so thick the algae bloom uses up oxygen and the aquatic plants and fish, crayfish, turtles die from lack of oxygen. That is similar to what happens when we get a thick covering of ice at this Creek – no oxygen and the fish die. When it thaws, the fish, usually shad, rise to the surface and their bodies drift toward the shore and pile up there. Ugh.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Pam Lazos says:

        This is the same thing that’s happening in the Chesapeake Bay, Linda.

        Like

      • Linda Schaub says:

        That’s a shame Pam. Shore birds and birds of prey will suffer as they eat the contaminated fish – the birds need to drink water. Hope they don’t go there too, but I mentioned to you a few months ago that I can remember homeowners along the shoreline of a contaminated body of water, came out of their homes to find many dead mallards washed up along the shoreline … all had ingested the toxic algae bloom

        Liked by 1 person

      • Pam Lazos says:

        So sad, Linda.

        Like

  4. Linda Schaub says:

    Hi Pam – I saw this article on my all-news radio station about toxic algae bloom that we discussed a few weeks ago, so I wanted to send it to you. This is not in my county – it’s about 25 miles away.
    https://wwjnewsradio.radio.com/articles/radiocom/man-plants-mystery-seeds-from-china?utm_campaign=https%3A%2F%2Fwwjnewsradio.radio.com%2F&utm_content=1596730801&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_term=WWJ-AM&fbclid=IwAR1tGTEjBfGOkUULIoshCXKe_iFya1z0mVm3ih5p84i42xgPv9VLcLJWx00

    Liked by 2 people

  5. cath says:

    Thanks for the good news about the filter, Pam. It sounds amazingly simple. I wonder if this technology is being put to use in other places too… I suppose it’s up to us to start asking questions.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. We don’t seem to get things right the first time, do we? Sigh. Interesting post.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. I don’t think we want to know how many forever chemicals are floating around inside our bodies. It would probably blow our minds. Thank goodness they are coming up with traps to filter our water.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Linda Schaub says:

    I wonder if they know about PFAS traps here in Michigan Pam … especially along the 130-mile Huron River where there are signs everywhere not to eat the fish? Good they are doing something to negate a product that was formerly revered … if only there was a fix for everything that is wreaking havoc in the rest of the world.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Damyanti Biswas says:

    I did not know about this. Thank you for sharing.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. I’d never heard of PFAs until your post, Pam; thanks for sharing. Would you agree it’s a case of science taketh away and giveth back? It’s great that scientists created traps that can help.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Pam Lazos says:

      Yes, I guess you could characterize it that way since we have so many great products because of PFAS. I do wish that our manufacturing processes were cradle to grave though, and focused more on public health and less on profit. Thanks for stopping by, Lizbeth. 🙏

      Like

  11. Humans have never been perfect – errors in judgement based on so many factors. At the same time, they learn and adapt. Sharing blogs, such as this, is a way to get information out there for people to read, learn, and make changes as needed. Thanks for posting and for being a part of #WATWB

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Ally Bean says:

    Interesting. I didn’t know about this, but now that I do I like that something positive is being done about it. Gotta love science if’n you want to live healthy.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. There’s a former military facility a few miles from my house. Military planes used it for years. It is now privately owned, but redevelopment is on hold because of the damage that PFAs did to the neighboring areas’ ground waters. (PFAs were used on the runways at the facility)

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Susan Scott says:

    Thanks Pam, who would’ve known that our lives are so (further) endangered. Good that those traps can be self-assembled, the sooner they can be used the better. Important to get this news out to the world, thank you, great post. Have a lovely weekend 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  15. hilarymb says:

    Hi Pam – thank you for this … I’d noted about this range of chemicals and their apparent usefulness … and worry about the waste plastic that’s around … on the ground, in the air, in water (the rivers and oceans). So these PFAS traps are so good to know about … science is being so essential to us now-a-days … an excellent #WATWB news story … take care – Hilary

    Liked by 3 people

    • Pam Lazos says:

      Hopefully, we’ll be able to science 🧪 our way out of themes we’re in, right, Hilary?!🤓

      Liked by 2 people

      • hilarymb says:

        I think I’m losing my mind on what we can or can’t do … but I’m alive and active … let the government change the rules and advice every five minutes … I don’t mind – I’m too old to mind!! The (the Govt) changed the rules at about 9.00 pm last night for today – presumably midnight last night … stupid – may be necessary … but such a mix up. Still I’d rather be here … take care – Hilary

        Liked by 2 people

      • Pam Lazos says:

        Haha, yes, me, too, Hilary!🤣😂😷

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.